Besides, other games have already filled the niche and have most of the ccg audience taken, what would make GW2 so unique in what it offers that others havent innovated on already. With the recent shift in development focus from the devs to bring path of fire between season 3 and 4 within a very short interval of time means that things are going at a pace that shouldn't be shaken for the sake of a ccg that the devs don't really have enough experience to make, nor have the data to ensure that it's something popular enough to warrant development on. It's not about being able to afford it, it's about what makes the most sense to put resources into. We also have a real world case of the devs abandoning a side feature, polymock, in favour of the main game.
So the unconventional route taken means that GW2 must suddenly jump on a ccg bandwagon?Īnd not only that, having a gw2 ccg have it's on development team by default means resources are taken away from GW2, because any devs working on the ccg could be devs working on GW2. It does away with typical things like the holy trinity and eschews traditional group mechanics for open-world content, which anyone can join in on without hampering other players. GW2 is mostly unconventional because it didn't become free to play until the first expansion released, had a cash shop since release (when it was buy to play, not free to play), and has made it's cash shop mostly cosmetic, with some quality of life enhancers. Guild Wars 2 represents ArenaNet’s attempt to turn MMO convention on its ears and create an engaging game for players of all skill levels and play styles. I don't understand the leap in logic here. Said:Anet already jumped on the f2p bandwagon and team for ccg would not take dev time from GW2 because as you said it would be it's own.And i presume Anet is rich enough now after PoF sales to afford it.
0 kommentar(er)
